BULLENERGY
Heat engine and other power plants
How good are power plants really
Does this picture really show the modern world?
We at BULLENERGY asked ourselves: what distinguishes previous power plants, what are their advantages and disadvantages? This is important for us to give you an open and honest assessment of whether it is worth supporting Rolf Kranen’s power plant.
And clearly, the overview can never take into account all aspects. We can’t do that any more than anyone else. If you have any suggestions about this, please feel free to let us know
Economy and ecology: The cost of production
When economy and ecology are in harmony, the cost of generation per kilowatt-hour of energy is low. This depends on the extent to which resource conservation takes place. The figures shown are by no means glossed over in favor of the heat engine, but were calculated according to the procedure of the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems in Freiburg. This method can only look at part of the economics of a power plant. The expensive power lines, whose realization is often associated with years of legal disputes, are not taken into account. This is logical, since the distances between power generation and feed-in point are different. What is not taken into account is that solar and wind power plants are not base-load capable.
One plan is to build hydrogen energy storage plants to offset fluctuations in generation. These are expensive. About 40 percent of the energy generated is lost in the process. An energy system that relies solely on wind and solar power is one thing above all others. It’s a resource-eating program that will put a lot of people to work. In the end, the question we are asking here is simple. Isn’t it necessary to try many other ideas before masses of resources are wasted? Human creative power that could be put to far better use with smarter ideas.
Heat engine, other power plants
A comparison with wind and solar, nuclear, oil and gas power plants.
BULLENERGY
Regenerative Innovative